[ad_1]
There are very few sitcoms, thrillers, or plays whose plots could tolerate the addition of a cell phone. Once the characters are able to connect at will and clear up any misunderstandings, much of the tension disappears. If Juliet had a smartphone, she and Romeo would have gotten married and lived in a house in the suburbs.
And the ubiquitous in-person meetings have an equally long history. But they still occur with little change, with the powers that be in control, traditionally privileged voices being the loudest, and leaving no room for new information or asynchronous interactions.
Political debate has changed little since Lincoln’s time. Yes, there are microphones now, but it never occurred to the organizers to use a timer to turn off the microphone when the time is up, let alone real-time fact-checking. We still reward bullying, verbal abuse, and dominant dancing.
Email, once the most modern form of communication, hasn’t changed much since I got my first address in 1976. There are hundreds of ways to be dramatically more effective and efficient, but we’re stuck.
Weddings, high school graduations, and funerals will continue as usual.
One of the reasons these formats persist is because they are connected devices, and it’s very difficult for everyone involved to agree on a new way of doing things, so we often think we need to stick with the status quo. thinking about. Still, sometimes new ways of doing things emergeā¦but we sometimes stick to old ways without thinking about why.
Humans have been communicating and coordinating since time immemorial. But over the past 50 years, we have transformed technology. Now we need to think hard about whether we stick to something because it works, or because we’ve always done it that way.
[ad_2]
Source link